4.7 Article

Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 18, Pages 2252-2258

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn327

Keywords

cardiac troponin; cardiovascular disease; risk prediction

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2003-71X-00676-21A]
  2. Linne Foundation for Medical Research, Uppsala, Sweden
  3. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To evaluate the prevalence of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) elevation in an elderly community population and the association of cTnI levels with cardiovascular risk factors, vascular inflammation, atherosclerosis, cardiac performance, and areas indicative of infarcted myocardium identified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Methods and results cTnI elevation defined as cTnI levels > 0.01 mu g/L (Access AccuTnI, Beckman Coulter) was found in 21.8% of the study participants (n = 1005). cTnI > 0.01 mu g/L was associated with cardiovascular high-risk features, the burden of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries, left-ventricular mass, and impaired left-ventricular systolic function. No associations were found between cTnI and inflammatory activity, diastolic dysfunction, or myocardial scars. Male gender (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4), ischaemic ECG changes (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7), and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7) independently predicted cTnI > 0.01 mu g/L. cTnI > 0.01 mu g/L correlated also to an increased cardiovascular risk according to the Framingham risk score. Conclusion cTnI > 0.01 mu g/L is relatively common in elderly subjects and is associated with cardiovascular high-risk features and impaired cardiac performance. Cardiac troponin determined by a highly sensitive assay might thus serve as an instrument for the identification of subjects at high cardiovascular risk in general populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available