4.7 Article

Interindividual variability in the response to oral antiplatelet drugs: a position paper of the Working Group on antiplatelet drugs resistance appointed by the Section of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society, endorsed by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 426-435

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn562

Keywords

Platelets; Antiplatelet agents; Monitoring; Resistance; Variability; Aspirin; Clopidogrel

Funding

  1. Danish Research Agency [2101-05-0052]
  2. AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, sanofi-aventis and Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oral antiplatelet drugs are a cornerstone of modern pharmacotherapy in cardiovascular atherothrombotic diseases. The efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) and clopidogrel in decreasing the risk of adverse events in coronary heart disease patients has been well established in the past 20 years. Despite chronic oral antiplatelet therapy, a number of atherothombotic events continue to occur. In recent years, a number of reports in the literature have shown possible relationships between residual platelet activity, as measured with a variety of laboratory tests, and clinical outcome, raising the possibility that 'resistance' to oral antiplatelet drugs may underlie many such clinical adverse events. The present position paper, conveyed within a group of clinical cardiologists with expertise in thrombosis appointed by the Section of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society, has been further elaborated and endorsed by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. It aims at summarizing the main findings in this complex area, issuing opinions in cases of high controversy, and fostering future research in this area to obtain reliable laboratory and clinical data for the resolution of the many problems still open.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available