4.7 Article

Prognostic value of circulating chromogranin A levels in acute coronary syndromes

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 25-32

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn513

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [14231]
  2. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  3. Karolinska Institutet
  4. Stockholm County Council
  5. Vastra Gotaland Region
  6. Vardal Foundation
  7. Gothenburg University
  8. Gothenburg Medical Society
  9. Akershus University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine whether circulating levels of chromogranin A (CgA) provide prognostic information independently of conventional risk markers in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). We measured circulating CgA levels on day 1 in 1268 patients (median age 67 years, 70% male) with ACS admitted to a single coronary care unit of a Scandinavian teaching hospital. The merit of CgA as a biomarker was evaluated after adjusting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors. During a median follow-up of 92 months, 389 patients (31%) died. The baseline CgA concentration was strongly associated with increased long-term mortality [hazard ratio per 1 standard deviation increase in logarithmically transformed CgA level: 1.57 (1.44-1.70), P < 0.001], heart failure hospitalizations [1.54 (1.35-1.76), P < 0.001], and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) [1.27 (1.10-1.47), P < 0.001], but not stroke. After adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk markers, the association remained significant for mortality [hazard ratio 1.28 (1.15-1.42), P < 0.001] and heart failure hospitalization [hazard ratio 1.24 (1.04-1.47), P = 0.02], but not recurrent MI. CgA is an independent predictor of long-term mortality and heart failure hospitalizations across the spectrum of ACSs and provides incremental prognostic information to conventional cardiovascular risk markers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available