4.7 Article

The effect of pre-operative aspirin on bleeding, transfusion, myocardial infarction, and mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review of randomized and observational studies

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1057-1071

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn104

Keywords

aspirin; coronary bypass surgery; haemorrhage; myocardial infarction; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To obtain estimates of the efficacy and safety of pre-operative aspirin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods and results Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of patients undergoing CABG, comparing pre-operative aspirin with no aspirin/placebo, and reporting at least one of our primary outcomes. In eight RCTs (n=805), pre-operative aspirin increased post-operative bleeding [Mean difference (MD), 104.9 mL; 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.2-190.6; P=0.016] and reoperation [odds ratio (OR), 2.52; 95% CI, 1.18-5.38; P=0.017), but not transfusion requirements (MD, 0.62 units; 95% CI, -0.06-1.30; P=0.072). Subgroup analysis suggested that bleeding was increased with aspirin doses >= 325 mg/day, but not with lower doses. In 14 observational studies (n=4485), pre-operative aspirin increased post-operative bleeding (MD, 113.6 mL; 95% CI, 45.2-182.0; P=0.001) and transfusion requirements (MD, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.56 units; P=0.002), but not reoperation (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.69-1.83; P=0.647). Neither analysis detected a significant effect on myocardial infarction or death. Conclusion Pre-operative aspirin increases post-operative bleeding, but this may be avoided by the use of aspirin doses < 325 mg/day. Most of the RCTs are old and the meta-analysis was underpowered for efficacy outcomes. A large randomized trial is necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of pre-operative aspirin in the setting of contemporary cardiac surgical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available