4.7 Article

Growth-differentiation factor-15 for early risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 19, Pages 2327-2335

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn339

Keywords

growth-differentiation factor-15; acute chest pain; risk stratification; biomarker

Funding

  1. BioChancePlus (German Ministry of Education and Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has emerged as a biomarker of increased mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients diagnosed with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. We explored the usefulness of GDF-15 for early risk stratification in 479 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Methods and results Sixty-nine per cent of the patients presented with GDF-15 levels above the previously defined upper reference limit (1200 ng/L). The risks of the composite endpoint of death or (recurrent) MI after 6 months were 1.3, 5.1, and 12.6% in patients with normal (, 1200 ng/L), moderately elevated (1200-1800 ng/L), or markedly elevated (. 1800 ng/L) levels of GDF-15 on admission, respectively (P < 0.001). By multivariable analysis that included clinical characteristics, ECG findings, peak cardiac troponin I levels within 2 h (cTnl(0-2) h), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and cystatin C, GDF-15 remained an independent predictor of the composite endpoint. The ability of the ECG combined with peak cTnl(0-2) (h) to predict the composite endpoint was markedly improved by addition of GDF-15 (c-statistic, 0.74 vs. 0.83; P < 0.001). Conclusion GDF-15 improves risk stratification in unselected patients with acute chest pain and provides prognostic information beyond clinical characteristics, the ECG, and cTnl.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available