4.5 Article

Acute schizophrenia is accompanied by reduced T cell and increased B cell immunity

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-010-0098-x

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Flow cytometry; Lymphocytes; Medication; Smoking; Stress; Review

Funding

  1. Saxony-Anhalt Ministry of Research [XN3594O/0405M, N2-OGU]
  2. Stanley Medical Research Foundation [07R-1832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies of lymphocyte distribution in schizophrenia have yielded inconsistent results, as summarized in the present study. Based on our own original data, potential confounds that might explain these variations are analyzed and discussed. Blood samples from 26 patients with acute paranoid schizophrenia were investigated in comparison with 32 matched healthy controls by flow cytometry (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD56 phenotyping). A subgroup of drug-free patients was followed up after 6 weeks of treatment. Cotinine levels and the free cortisol index (FCI) were provided in order to control for medication, smoking, and stress. Cotinine levels correlated with natural killer (NK) cell counts (CD3(-)/CD56(+): r = -0.383, P = 0.003) while the FCI was related to B cell numbers (CD19(+): r = 0.390, P = 0.003). Considering these covariates, a lower level of T helper cells (P = 0.010), a reduced CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.029), and elevated B cells (P = 0.008) were found during acute psychosis. After 6 weeks of medication, an inverse pattern was observed in initially drug-free patients: total T cell (P = 0.005), T helper (P = 0.003), and T suppressor/cytotoxic cells (P = 0.005) increased, while B cell counts declined (P = 0.049). In conclusion, acute paranoid schizophrenia may be accompanied by a reduced T cell defense and a shift towards B cell immunity, which normalizes in response to treatment. In addition to disease stage or subtype and medication, cigarette smoking and stress are important co-factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available