4.7 Article

Indirect determination of the mobility of structure-borne sound sources

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages 38-58

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK [EP/H040293/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H040293/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H040293/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods are considered for the indirect determination of the mobility of structure-borne sound sources. Instead of performing measurements on the source in the free state, the source mobility is obtained from measurements made in-situ. This approach is beneficial if the source is difficult to suspend, or if it contains nonlinear structural elements. Two formulations for an indirect source mobility are derived theoretically. The first requires measurement of velocities at or near to the contact points. The second involves measurement of remote velocities only. Neither of the methods requires excitation at the contacts in the coupled state. Numerical simulations of coupled beams are used to validate the two methods and investigate their accuracy and reliability with respect to typical measurement errors, such as background noise and inaccuracies in sensor positioning. It is found that these can have a significant effect on the methods considered. Several experimental case studies with single contact and multi-contact sources are performed. The results confirm the validity of the two methods in principle, but highlight their sensitivity to experimental errors. In a representative case study with a fan unit, average errors range between +/- 5 dB and +/- 10 dB, with occasional errors of up to 30 dB. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available