4.6 Article

Implications of bipolar voltage mapping and magnetic resonance imaging resolution in biventricular scar characterization after myocardial infarction

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 163-174

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy192

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; T1 mapping; Myocardial infarction; Voltage mapping; Myocardial substrate

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MEIC)
  2. Pro CNIC Foundation
  3. CNIC [SEV-2015-0505]
  4. BSC (Barcelona, Spain) [SEV-2011-0067]
  5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [RD12/0042/0036, CB16/11/00458]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [SAF2016-80324-R, PI16/02110, DTS17/00136]
  7. European Commission [JTC2016/APCIN-ISCIII-2016, AC16/00021]
  8. Fundacion Interhospitalaria para la Investigacion Cardiovascular (FIC, Madrid, Spain)
  9. heart rhyhtm section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology
  10. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, USA, National Institutes of Health [HL122352]
  11. CompBioMed project European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [H2020-EU.1.4.1.3, 675451]
  12. 'la Caixa' Fellowship Grant for Doctoral Studies, 'la Caixa' Banking Foundation, Barcelona, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims We aimed to study the differences in biventricular scar characterization using bipolar voltage mapping compared with state-of-the-art in vivo delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging and ex vivo T1 mapping. Methods and results Ten pigs with established myocardial infarction (MI) underwent in vivo scar characterization using LGE-CMR imaging and high-density voltage mapping of both ventricles using a 3.5-mm tip catheter. Ex vivo post-contrast T1 mapping provided a high-resolution reference. Voltage maps were registered onto the left and right ventricular (LV and RV) endocardium, and epicardium of CMR-based geometries to compare voltage-derived scars with surface-projected 3D scars. Voltage-derived scar tissue of the LV endocardium and the epicardium resembled surface projections of 3D in vivo and ex vivo CMR-derived scars using 1-mm of surface projection distance. The thinner watt of the RV was especially sensitive to lower resolution in vivo LGE-CMR images, in which differences between normalized low bipolar voltage areas and CMR-derived scar areas did not decrease below a median of 8.84% [interquartile range (IQR) (3.58, 12.70%)]. Overall, voltage-derived scars and surface scar projections from in vivo LGE-CMR sequences showed larger normalized scar areas than high-resolution ex vivo images [12.87% (4.59, 27.15%), 18.51% (11.25, 24.61%), and 9.30% (184, 19.59%), respectively], despite having used optimized surface projection distances. Importantly, 43.02% (36.54, 48.72%) of voltage-derived scar areas from the LV endocardium were classified as non-enhanced healthy myocardium using ex vivo CMR imaging. Conclusion In vivo LGE-CMR sequences and high-density voltage mapping using a conventional linear catheter fail to provide accu- rate characterization of post-MI scar, limiting the specificity of voltage-based strategies and imaging-guided procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available