4.6 Article

Screening of genes encoding junctional candidates in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 1522-1525

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut224

Keywords

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; dysplasia; Candidate gene analysis; Desmosomes; Mutation; Genetics; Cardiomyopathy

Funding

  1. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris [PHRC programme hospitalier de recherche AOM] [05073]
  2. 'Federation Francaise de Cardiologie'/'Societe Francaise de Cardiologie'
  3. Ligue contre la cardiomyopathie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibro-fatty replacement of the right ventricle and ventricular arrhythmias. The major disease-causing genes encode cardiac desmosomal components but are involved in only 50 of patients. To identify the missing genetic determinants, we used a candidate gene approach, focusing on the 3-untranslated region (UTR) of the main ARVC/D gene PKP2 and on additional genes involved in desmosomal structure or function. We screened a population of 64 ARVC/D probands with no identified mutations in any of the five known desmosomal genes (PKP2, DSG2, DSP, DSC2, and JUP). No putative mutation was identified in the 3-UTR of PKP2 or in PNN, CTNNA3, CAV1, or PLN coding sequences. In a single proband, we identified two rare heterozygous missense variants affecting evolutionary conserved residues: c.175GA (p.Gly59Arg) in PERP and c.1811AG (p.Asp604Gly) in PKP4 (minor allele frequency 0.5 in control population). Our study suggests that mutations in the candidate genes studied and regulation of PKP2 mRNA via 3-UTR dependent mechanisms are unlikely to be major causes of ARVC/D in the studied population. Additional studies are needed to investigate the putative effects of rare PKP4 and PERP variants in this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available