4.6 Article

Uric acid is associated with future atrial fibrillation: an 11-year follow-up of 6308 men and womenuthe Troms Study

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 320-326

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut260

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Risk factors; Uric acid; Sex differences

Funding

  1. Norwegian EXTRA Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation through EXTRA funds
  2. Norwegian Heart and Lung Patient Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum uric acid (SUA) has been associated with cardiovascular disease in population studies, but its relation to atrial fibrillation (AF) is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between baseline SUA and future AF in a large population-based cohort. A total of 6308 men and women from a population survey in Troms, Norway in 199495 were followed-up for 10.8 years. The mean age at baseline was 60 years. Information on angina, myocardial infarction, diabetes, anti-hypertensive and diuretic treatment, physical activity, smoking and alcohol, and measurements of height, weight, blood pressure, SUA, total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol were obtained at baseline. The outcome measure was first-ever AF, documented on an electrocardiogram. We identified 572 cases of incident AF. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and concomitant diseases, SUA was associated with AF in both sexes. Hazard ratio per 1 SD increase in SUA (91 mol/L) was 1.40 [95 confidence intervals (CI), 1.141.72] in women and 1.17 (95 CI, 1.021.36) in men. The upper quartile of SUA conferred a 76 increased risk for AF in women and 49 in men as compared with the lowest quartile. This prospective population-based cohort study showed that baseline SUA was associated with an increased risk for future AF in both sexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available