4.6 Article

Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 346-354

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq407

Keywords

Angiotensin-converting enzyme; Gene polymorphism; Atrial fibrillation; Arrhythmias; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30770863]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Recent observations have raised concerns regarding the activation of the renin-angiotensin system and the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some initial studies indicated an association between an angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphism and AF, however, the results have been inconsistent. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the validity of this association. Methods and results PubMed, Cochrane clinical trials database, and EMBASE were searched through July 2009, and a manual search was also performed. Of the 68 initially identified studies, 18 case-control studies with 7577 patients were finally analysed. No statistically significant associations were found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and AF risk in the genetic additive model and dominant model, whereas a significant association was observed in the recessive model. A significant heterogeneity between individual studies was evident in all three models. Subgroup analyses showed a strong association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and hypertensive AF without significant heterogeneity. Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate an association between ACE I/D polymorphism and AF risk. However, there seems to be a significant association between ACE I/D gene polymorphic variation and AF in patients with hypertension. Additional studies are warranted to further explore this association in ethnically diverse populations and varied cardiovascular substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available