4.6 Article

Heart rhythm at the time of death documented by an implantable loop recorder

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 254-260

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup383

Keywords

Arrhythmia; Myocardial infarction; Implantable loop recorder; CARISMA

Funding

  1. Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  2. Cambridge Heart Inc., MA, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this study were to describe arrhythmias documented with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with left ventricular dysfunction at the time of death and to establish the correlation to mode of death. Post-mortem ILR device interrogations were analysed from patients dying in the CARISMA study. Mode of death was classified by a modified CAST classification. Twenty-six patients died with an implanted ILR. Of these, 16 had an electrocardiogram recorded at the time of death. Ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was terminal rhythm in eight patients and bradyarrhythmias were observed in another eight patients. Of the deaths with peri-mortem recordings, seven were classified as sudden cardiac death (SCD). In six of these, VF was documented at the time of death. Six monitored deaths were classified as non-SCD (NSCD) of which only two had recordings of VT/VF, whereas four had bradyarrhythmias. All peri-mortem recordings in non-cardiac death (NCD) were bradyarrhythmia. Long-term monitoring in a population of post-AMI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% showed that VT/VF and bradyarrhythmia each accounted for half of the recorded events at the time of death. The ILR confirmed that ventricular tachyarrhythmias are associated primarily with SCD, whereas bradyarrhythmias and electromechanical dissociation seems dominant in NSCD and NCD. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00145119.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available