4.5 Article

Characteristics and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction by discharge diagnosis: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 499-504

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.02.004

Keywords

Mortality; Myocardial infarction; Prognosis

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service [U01 NS041588]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health [K24 HL111154, R01 HL080477]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare the characteristics and prognosis of acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) that were not the primary reason for hospitalization, and thus not primary discharge diagnosis, to AMIs that were the primary reason for hospitalization. Methods: Primary discharge diagnoses for Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study participants (black and white men and women age >= 45 years) with adjudicated AMIs were categorized as AMI or other. Cox models were used to compare mortality up to 5 years post-AMI between primary discharge diagnoses of AMI and other. Results: Of 871 AMIs, primary discharge diagnosis was not AMI in 550 (63%). When primary discharge diagnosis was not AMI, average troponin elevations were smaller and heart failure was more common. Adjusted for participant and hospitalization characteristics, all-cause, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular disease mortality after AMI were similar between groups (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.08 [0.80-1.47]; 1.29 [0.76-2.18]; and 0.86 [0.58-1.27], respectively). Conclusions: Studies limited to individuals with primary discharge diagnosis of AMI may underestimate the burden of AMI and exclude a group with elevated risk of all-cause, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular disease mortality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available