4.5 Article

Reciprocal differences in DNA sequence and methylation status of the pollen DNA between F1 hybrids of Solanum tuberosum x S. demissum

Journal

EUPHYTICA
Volume 182, Issue 2, Pages 219-229

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0444-8

Keywords

Solanum tuberosum; Reciprocal difference; Solanum demissum; DNA methylation; Pollen DNA; MSAP analysis

Funding

  1. MEXT [18580005]
  2. Calbee Potato, Inc.
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18580005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reciprocal differences, mostly caused by cytoplasmic effects, are frequently observed in interspecific hybrids. Previously, we found that crosses onto Solanum demissum were much successful with the pollen of interspecific hybrids between S. tuberosum as female and S. demissum as male (TD hybrids) than the reciprocal ones (DT hybrids). To elucidate this reciprocally different crossability, we analyzed the pollen DNA of TD and DT using methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) analysis. Using 126 primer combinations, MSAP analysis revealed 57 different bands between bulked pollen DNA samples of TD and DT. Individual examination of 16 TD and 9 DT plants disclosed eight bands uniformly different between TD and DT. Their sequencing results revealed two pairs of bands to be identical to each other, resulting in six distinct sequences. As expected, one band shared high homology with chloroplast DNA, and another one with mitochondrial DNA. However, one band that was apparently different at DNA sequence level and maternally transmitted from S. demissum, showed no homology with any known sequence. The remaining three bands were of DNA methylation level differences with no or uncertain homology to known sequences. To our knowledge, this is the first report detecting reciprocal differences in DNA sequence or DNA methylation other than those in cytoplasmic DNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available