4.5 Article

Correlations between the stability and adaptability statistics of popcorn cultivars

Journal

EUPHYTICA
Volume 174, Issue 2, Pages 209-218

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-010-0118-y

Keywords

Zea mays L.; Popcorn breeding; Genotype versus environment interaction; Multi-environment trials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In plant breeding, correlations between the statistics of stability and adaptability of popcorn cultivars are not yet well understood. Therefore, the objectives of the present experiment was to investigate the correlations between sigma(2)(di) and beta(i) from Eberhart and Russell, omega(i) from Wricke, S(i)((1)), S(i)((2)) and S(i)((3)) from Huehn, P(i) from Lin and Binns and the rank-sum from Kang, and indicate the most reliable method for selecting popcorn cultivars. These statistics were estimated by data of crop yield from 19 Brazilian genotypes under 21 environments and popping expansion under 16 environments. The omega(i), S(i)((1)), S(i)((2)), S(i)((3)) and sigma(2)(di) were positively and significantly correlated indicating that just one in these five statistics is sufficient for selecting stable genotypes although they were not correlated with the means of crop yield and popping expansion. The beta(i) was negatively and significantly correlated with P(i) for crop yield indicating that the most adaptable genotypes tend to have the lowest estimates of P(i). Although P(i) was not correlated with omega(i), S(i)((1)), S(i)((2)), S(i)((3)), or sigma(2)(di) statistics, it displayed positive correlation with the Index 1 (crop yield and popping expansion + S(i)((1)) rank) and Index 2 (crop yield and popping expansion + W(i)) indicating that superior popcorn genotypes are also stable. Finally, both P(i) and the rank-sum are useful statistics in breeding programmes where crop yield, popping expansion and stability are essential traits for selecting genotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available