4.6 Article

Synthesis and characterization of La0.6Sr0.4Fe0.8Cu0.2O3-δ oxide as cathode for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 208-213

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.04.044

Keywords

IT-SOFC; Cathode; Perovskite; Gel combustion

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion (Uruguay) [FSE_2009_1_51]
  2. Laboratorio Nacional de Luz Synchrotron (LNLS, Campinas, SP, Brazil)
  3. ANII [POS_NAC_2014_1_102615]
  4. University of Cuyo
  5. CNEA
  6. ANPCyT-PICT (Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocrystalline La0.6Sr0.4Fe0.8Cu0.2O3-delta (LSFCu) material was synthetized by combustion method using EDTA as fuel/chelating agent and NH4NO3 as combustion promoter. Structural characterization using thermodiffraction data allowed to determine a reversible phase transition at 425 degrees C from a low temperature R-3c phase to a high temperature Pm-3m phase and to calculate the thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) of both phases. Important characteristics for cathode application as electronic conductivity and chemical compatibility with Ce0.9Gd0.1O2-delta (CGO) electrolyte were evaluated. LSFCu presented a p-type conductor behavior with maximum conductivity of 135 S cm(-1) at 275 degrees C and showed a good stability with CGO electrolyte at high temperatures. This work confirmed that as prepared LSFCu has excellent microstructural characteristics and an electrical conductivity between 100 and 60 S cm(-1) in the 500-700 degrees C range which is sufficiently high to work as intermediate temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (IT-SOFCs) cathode. However a change in the thermal expansion coefficient consistent with a small oxygen loss process may affect the electrode-electrolyte interface during fabrication and operation of a SOFC. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available