4.2 Article

Is play behavior sexually dimorphic in monogamous species?

Journal

ETHOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 10, Pages 989-998

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01543.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Good Nature Institute
  2. California National Primate Research Center NIH base [RR00169]
  3. NSF [0437523]
  4. NIH [MH073022]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0437523] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0437523] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monogamy is a relatively rare social system in mammals, occurring only in about 3% of mammalian species. Monogamous species are characterized by the formation of pair-bonds, biparental care, and a very low level of sexual dimorphism. Whereas in most polygynous species males engage in more rough-and-tumble play than females, we predicted that males and females of monogamous species would have similar, or monomorphic, play behavior. In this study, we focused on two monogamous species: coppery titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) and prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). We documented the development of play behavior in both species, and quantified different types of play behavior. We did not find any sex differences in either species in the frequencies and types of play. However, we did find sex differences in the choice of play partner in titi monkeys: female offspring spent a higher proportion of time playing with their father, while male offspring played equally with their mother and father. It is possible that rough-and-tumble play behavior is monomorphic in many monogamous mammals, perhaps reflecting differences from polygynous species in the effects of exposure to early androgens or in the estrogen receptor distribution. However, more subtle differences in monomorphic play behavior, such as choice of partner, may still exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available