4.8 Article

Differentiating Ferroelectric and Nonferroelectric Electromechanical Effects with Scanning Probe Microscopy

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 6484-6492

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02227

Keywords

scanning probe microscopy; ferroelectricity; electrostatics; relaxors

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, through the Office of Science Early Career Research Program
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, through Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  3. DOE Office of Science User Facility
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB921700]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11274194]
  6. National Science Foundation DMREF [DMR-1234096]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1234096] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferroelectricity in functional materials remains one of the most fascinating areas of modern science in the past several decades. In the last several years, the rapid development of piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and spectroscopy revealed the presence of electromechanical hysteresis loops and bias-induced remnant polar states in a broad variety of materials including many inorganic oxides, polymers, and biosystems. In many cases, this behavior was interpreted as the ample evidence for ferroelectric nature of the system. Here, we systematically analyze PFM responses on ferroelectric and nonferroelectric materials and demonstrate that mechanisms unrelated to ferroelectricity can induce ferroelectric-like characteristics through charge injection and electrostatic forces on the tip. We will focus on similarities and differences in various PFM measurement characteristics to provide an experimental guideline to differentiate between ferroelectric material properties and charge injection. In the end, we apply the developed measurement protocols to an unknown ferroelectric material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available