4.6 Article

Linking CDOM spectral absorption to dissolved organic carbon concentrations and loadings in boreal estuaries

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 107-117

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.06.015

Keywords

dissolved organic carbon; chromophoric dissolved organic matter; riverine organic loading; absorption coefficient; estuarine gradient

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [127097]
  2. Walter and Andree de Nottbeck Foundation
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [127097, 127097] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quantity of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in three Finnish estuaries (Karjaanjoki, Kyronjoki and Kiiminkijoki) was investigated, with respect to predicting DOC concentrations and loadings from spectral CDOM absorption measurements. Altogether 87 samples were collected from three estuarine transects which were studied in three seasons, covering a salinity range between 0 and 6.8, and DOC concentrations from 1572 mu mol l(-1) in freshwater to 222 mu mol l(-1) in coastal waters. CDOM absorption coefficient, a(CDOM(375)) values followed the trend in DOC concentrations across the salinity gradient and ranged from 1.67 to 33.4 m(-1). The link between DOC and CDOM was studied using a range of wavelengths and algorithms. Wavelengths between 250 and 270 nm gave the best predictions with single linear regression. Total dissolved iron was found to influence the prediction in wavelengths above 520 nm. Despite significant seasonal and spatial differences in DOC CDOM models, a universal relationship was tested with an independent data set and found to be robust. DOC and CDOM yields (loading/catchment area) from the catchments ranged from 1.98 to 5.44 g C m(-2) yr(-1), and 1.67 to 11.5 a(CDOM(375)) yr(-1), respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available