4.6 Article

Factors responsible for the differences in satellite-based chlorophyll a concentration between the major global upwelling areas

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 775-786

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.005

Keywords

upwelling; Ekman transport; nutrients; chlorophyll

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to identify the factors responsible for the differences in chlorophyll a concentration (Ch1-a) observed between the California, Canary, Humboldt and Benguela upwelling areas. Monthly climatologic values of Ch1-a obtained from satellite images, covering the years 1998-2004, revealed that this pigment was higher in the Benguela system than in the other areas. Upwelling intensity, as derived from offshore Ekman transport computations, was higher in the Benguela and Humboldt regions and, for the same upwelling intensity, Ch1-a was higher in Benguela than in the other regions. Upwelling intensity appears to be able to drive Ch1-a densities through nutrient supply, as nutrients are correlated to offshore Ekman transport. A linear regression model including the fraction of sea surface over the shelf in each 1 degrees x 1 degrees box, nitrate, silicate, turbulence and variability of offshore Ekman transport explained the 84.8% of the variance in Ch1-a among the areas. Differences in offshore Ekman transport explained the lower Ch1-a observed in Canary and California and the higher Ch1-a observed in Benguela and Peru-Humboldt. A narrow continental shelf and low water column stability also contribute to reducing phytoplankton pigment biomass in the Canary and California areas. The higher Ch1-a values observed in Benguela compared to Humboldt-Peru are due to a wider extension of the continental shelf in the Benguela region. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available