4.5 Article

Scientific Bases for Numerical Chlorophyll Criteria in Chesapeake Bay

Journal

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 134-148

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-013-9656-6

Keywords

Phytoplankton; Chlorophyll; Water quality criteria; Estuaries; Chesapeake Bay

Funding

  1. NSF Biological Oceanography Program
  2. NOAA Chesapeake Bay Program Office
  3. NASA Land-Use Land-Cover Change Program
  4. NSF Ecosystems Science Programs
  5. NSF Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology Program
  6. Virginia Environmental Endowment
  7. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, ModMon and FerryMon Projects
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1119704] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In coastal ecosystems with long flushing times (weeks to months) relative to phytoplankton growth rates (hours to days), chlorophyll a (chl-a) integrates nutrient loading, making it a pivotal indicator with broad implications for ecosystem function and water-quality management. However, numerical chl-a criteria that capture the linkage between chl-a and ecosystem impairments associated with eutrophication (e.g., hypoxia, water clarity and loss of submerged aquatic vegetation, toxic algal blooms) have seldom been developed despite the vulnerability of these ecosystems to anthropogenic nutrient loading. Increases in fertilizer use, animal wastes, and population growth in the Chesapeake Bay watershed since World War II have led to increases in nutrient loading and chl-a. We describe the development of numerical chl-a criteria based on long-term research and monitoring of the bay. Baseline chl-a concentrations were derived using statistical models for historical data from the 1960s and 1970s, including terms to account for the effects of climate variability. This approach produced numerical chl-a criteria presented as geometric means and 90th percentile thresholds to be used as goals and compliance limits, respectively. We present scientific bases for these criteria that consider specific ecosystem impairments linked to increased chl-a, including low dissolved oxygen (DO), reduced water clarity, and toxic algal blooms. These multiple lines of evidence support numerical chl-a criteria consisting of seasonal mean chl-a across salinity zones ranging from 1.4 to 15 mg m(-3) as restoration goals and corresponding thresholds ranging from 4.3 to 45 mg m(-3) as compliance limits. Attainment of these goals and limits for chl-a is a precondition for attaining desired levels of DO, water clarity, and toxic phytoplankton prior to rapid human expansion in the watershed and associated increases of nutrient loading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available