4.4 Article

Subjective ratings of upper extremity exposures: Inter-method agreement with direct measurement of exposures

Journal

ERGONOMICS
Volume 51, Issue 7, Pages 1064-1077

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00140130801915220

Keywords

ergonomic exposure assessment; bioinstrumentation; electrogoniometry; electromyography; self-report; questionnaire

Funding

  1. NIOSH CDC HHS [R01 OH 03514, R01 OH003514] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH [R01OH003514] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the agreement of subjective ratings of upper extremity exposures with corresponding direct measurements obtained simultaneously from workers. Psychophysical ratings of exposure, based on the Borg CR-10 scale, were obtained for the period of time in which direct measurements were acquired using electrogoniometers (wrist), electroinclinometers (shoulder) and electromyography (grip force). Subjects were selected from workers at two automobile manufacturing plants. Significant relationships between subjective ratings of wrist position and measured wrist posture or motion and between ratings of shoulder position and measured shoulder posture were not found. Ratings of manual effort were significantly correlated with directly measured grip force (% maximum voluntary contraction). Ratings of pace were significantly correlated with directly measured wrist motion and this relationship was strengthened with the addition of relative grip force as a covariate. Workers with hand/wrist symptoms provided ratings that were more strongly related to the directly measured exposures than those without symptoms. Self-report by workers is an alternative to more resource-intensive and invasive exposure assessment methods. However, the validity of workers' self-reported exposure assessments has been questioned. The objective of this study was to examine the agreement of selected questionnaire items with corresponding direct measurements from bioinstrumentation and to provide a better understanding of worker self-reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available