Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research
Per Carlbring et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2007)
Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires
Stephanie Booth-Kewley et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2007)
Equivalence of standard and computerized versions of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test
JE Williams et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2006)
Do print and Web surveys provide the same results?
HM Huang
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2006)
Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information:: Psychological and physiological factors
E Wästlund et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2005)
An examination of the equivalence of web-based versus paper-and-pencil upward feedback ratings: Rater- and ratee-level analyses
JW Smither et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2004)
CRT monitors: Do they interfere with learning?
KJ Garland et al.
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2004)
Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: is workload another test mode effect?
J Noyes et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (2004)
VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce
JM Noyes et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS (2003)
Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter?
H Knapp et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2003)
Print versus electronic surveys: a comparison of two data collection methodologies
KK Boyer et al.
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (2002)
Social desirability and controllability in computerized and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires
S Fox et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2002)
The effect of computer-based tests on racial-ethnic and gender groups
A Gallagher et al.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT (2002)
Paper-and-pencil or online? Evaluating mode effects on measures of emotional functioning and attachment
RT Fouladi et al.
ASSESSMENT (2002)
Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings
BC Cronk et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS (2002)
The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension
M Pomplun et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2002)
Responding to free response examination questions: computer versus pen and paper
R MacCann et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (2002)
Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading
DK Mayes et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS (2001)
Comparison of two versions of a placement test: The paper-pencil version and the computer-based version
A Weinberg
CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES (2001)
Computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences
WP Vispoel et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2001)
Exploring the use of multimedia examination formats in undergraduate teaching: results from the fielding testing
M Liu et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2001)
Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: Issues, criteria and an example
TY Wang et al.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT (2001)
A comparison of paper vs computer-assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys
D Hallfors et al.
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING (2000)
Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight
MA Donovan et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
