Journal
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 1698-1706Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.015
Keywords
Massive rotator cuff tear; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; irreparable rotator cuff tear; latissimus dorsi transfer; value; economics; patient selection
Categories
Funding
- DJO Surgical
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Some patients unexpectedly have poor functional improvement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. Our aim was to identify risk factors for this outcome. We also assessed the value of RSA for cases with poor functional improvement vs. controls. Methods: The study was a retrospective case-control analysis for primary RSA performed for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis with minimum 2-year follow-up. Cases were defined as Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score improvement of <= 1, whereas controls improved SST score >= 2. Risk factors were chosen on the basis of previous association with poor outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer results were analyzed as a subgroup. Value was defined as improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score per $10,000 hospital cost. Results: In a multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis, neurologic dysfunction (P = .006), age <60 years (P = .02), and high preoperative SST score (P = .03) were independently associated with poor functional improvement. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer patients significantly improved in active external rotation (-0.3 degrees to 38.7 degrees; P < .01). The value of RSA (Delta ASES/$ 10,000 cost) for cases was 0.8 compared with 17.5 for controls (P < .0001). Conclusions: Young age, high preoperative function, and neurologic dysfunction were associated with poor functional improvement. Surgeons should consider these associations in counseling and selection of patients. Concurrent latissimus dorsi transfer was successful in restoring active external rotation in a subgroup of patients. The critical economic importance of improved patient selection is emphasized by the very low value of the procedure in the case group. (C) 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available