4.2 Article

Incidence and classification of new-onset epilepsy and epilepsy syndromes in children in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1980 to 2004: A population-based study

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 95, Issue 1-2, Pages 110-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.03.009

Keywords

Pediatric epilepsy; Incidence; Epilepsy syndrome

Funding

  1. Mayo Foundation
  2. Rochester Epidemiology Project [R01-AG034676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine the incidence and classification of new-onset epilepsy, as well as the distribution of epilepsy syndromes in a population-based group of children, using the newly proposed Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology 2005-2009. Methods: We identified all children residing in Olmsted County, MN, 1 month through 17 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy from 1980 to 2004. For each patient, epilepsy was classified into mode of onset, etiology, and syndrome or constellation (if present). Incidence rates were calculated overall and also separately for categories of mode of onset and etiology. Results: The adjusted incidence rate of new-onset epilepsy in children was 44.5 cases per 100,000 persons per year. Incidence rates were highest in the first year of life and diminished with age. Mode of onset was focal in 68%, generalized/bilateral in 23%, spasms in 3% and unknown in 5%. Approximately half of children had an unknown etiology for their epilepsy, and of the remainder, 78 (22%) were genetic and 101 (28%) were structural/metabolic. A specific epilepsy syndrome could be defined at initial diagnosis in 99/359 (28%) children, but only 9/359 (3%) had a defined constellation. Conclusion: Nearly half of childhood epilepsy is of unknown etiology. While a small proportion of this group met criteria for a known epilepsy syndrome, 41% of all childhood epilepsy is of unknown cause with no clear syndrome identified. Further work is needed to define more specific etiologies for this group. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available