4.5 Article

Suitability of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the in situ silylation of chlorophenols in water samples before gas chromatography with mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 20, Pages 3552-3559

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201500556

Keywords

Chlorophenols; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry; In situ silylation; Water and wastewater

Funding

  1. Central Laboratory of Isfahan University of Technology (IUT)
  2. Research Council of Isfahan University of Technology (IUT)
  3. Center of Excellence in Sensor and Green Chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trace analysis of chlorophenols in water was performed by simultaneous silylation and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction was carried out using an organic solvent lighter than water (n-hexane). The effect of different silylating reagents on the method efficiency was investigated. The influence of derivatization reagent volume, presence of catalyst and derivatization/extraction time on the yield of the derivatization reaction was studied. Different parameters affecting extraction efficiency such as kind and volume of extraction and disperser solvents, pH of the sample and addition of salt were also investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration graphs were linear in the range of 0.05-100 ng/mL and the limit of detection was 0.01 ng/mL. The enrichment factors were 242, 351, and 363 for 4-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, respectively. The values of intra-and inter-day relative standard deviations were in the range of 3.0-6.4 and 6.1-9.9%, respectively. The applicability of the method was investigated by analyzing water and wastewater samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available