4.4 Article

Negative effects of interictal spikes on theta rhythm in human temporal lobe epilepsy

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 207-212

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.07.014

Keywords

Temporal lobe epilepsy; Local held potential; Theta rhythm; Interidal spike

Funding

  1. Colleges and Universities of Hebei Province Science and Technology Research Projects [ZD2014026]
  2. University Innovation Team Leader Program of Hebei Province [LJRC003]
  3. NIH [1R01NS091604, P50MH106435]
  4. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z161100002616009]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81790652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interictal spike is a biomarker of epilepsy that can occur frequently between seizures. Its potential effects on brain oscillations, especially on theta rhythm (4-8 Hz) that is related to a variety of cognitive processes, remain controversial. Using local field potentials recorded from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we investigated here the impact of spikes on theta rhythm immediately after spikes and during the prolonged periods (lasting 4-36 s) between adjacent spikes. Local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded in different epileptogenic areas including the anterior hippocampus (aH) and the entorhinal cortex (EC) as well as in the extended propagation pathway. We found that interictal spikes had a significant inhibitory effect on theta rhythm. Power of theta rhythm was reduced immediately after spikes, and the inhibitory effect on theta rhythm might sustain during the prolonged between-spike periods. The inhibitory effect was more severe when the epileptogenic areas involved both the aH and EC compared to that involved only a single structure. These observations suggest that interictal spikes have a significant negative impact on theta rhythm and may thus playa role in theta-related cognition changes in patients with TLE. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available