4.5 Article

Pipette vial dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of benzoylurea insecticide in fruit juice

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 391-398

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201500714

Keywords

1-Dodecanol; Benzoylurea insecticides; Floating organic droplet; High-performance liquid chromatography; Microextraction

Funding

  1. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2014FG010, 2015QC074]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21277172, 20977112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, sensitive, and efficient method of using a pipette vial to perform dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplets was coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and a diode array detector for the preconcentration and analysis of four benzoylurea insecticides in fruit juice. In this method, 1-dodecanol was used as an extractant, and a snipped pipette was used as an experimental vial to simplify the procedure of collecting and separating solidified extractant. The experimental parameters were optimized using a Plackett-Burman design and one-factor- at-a-time method. Under the optimal conditions in the water model, the limits of detection for analytes varied from 0.03 to 0.28 mu g/L, and the enrichment factors ranged from 147 to 206. Linearity was achieved for diflubenzuron and flufenoxuron in a range of 0.5-500 mu g/L, for hexaflumuron in a range of 1-500 mu g/L, and for triflumuron in a range of 5-500 mu g/L. The correlation coefficients for the analytes ranged from 0.9986 to 0.9994 with recoveries of 91.4-110.9%. Finally, the developed technique was successfully applied to fruit juice samples with acceptable results. The relative standard deviations of the analytes at two spiking levels (50 and 200 mu g/L) varied between 0.2 and 4.5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available