4.4 Article

Trigeminal nerve stimulation in major depressive disorder: Acute outcomes in an open pilot study

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 221-226

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.05.008

Keywords

Noninvasive; Neuromodulation; Trigeminal nerve stimulation; Treatment-resistant depression; Cranial nerve

Funding

  1. Joanne and George Miller and Family Endowed Chair in Depression Research
  2. Covidien
  3. NeoSync
  4. Neuronetics
  5. NIH
  6. Sepracor/Sunovion
  7. Seaside Therapeutics
  8. NeuroSigma
  9. NIMH
  10. Shire Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not recover with initial pharmacotherapy, and many pursue combination treatments. Combining a medication with neuromodulation offers an alternative to purely pharmacologic strategies. In prior open and double-blind controlled trials for drug-resistant epilepsy, adjunctive external trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) was found to be safe and well tolerated, to significantly reduce seizures, and to be associated with an improvement in depressive symptoms. Here, we present a comprehensive description of the first open pilot investigation in MDD. In this 8-week trial, eleven adults with unipolar MDD received nightly stimulation (V-1 branch). All entered with moderate to severe symptom levels despite at least two antidepressant medication trials in this episode. All the eleven adults completed the acute trial, without serious adverse events. Symptoms of depression improved significantly, whether assessed with clinician-or self-rated scales (all p < 0.01; effect sizes d 1.0-1.8), as did quality of life (p < 0.02). Four of the 11 achieved remission. These improvements from nightly adjunctive eTNS in treatment-resistant depression merit replication under double-blind conditions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available