4.4 Article

Adjunctive use of verapamil in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: A pilot study

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 150-154

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.07.006

Keywords

Seizure reduction; Temporal lobe epilepsy; P-gp inhibitor; Verapamil

Funding

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [3629]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The present study aimed to determine if adjunctive use of verapamil, as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, is efficacious in decreasing seizure frequency in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Materials and methods: This was an open-label pilot study. Adult patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy were studied. Baseline seizure type and seizure count were determined. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group A received verapamil 120 mg/day (n = 13), and group B received 240 mg/day (n = 6). All patients were followed for eight weeks. The proportion of responders, which consist of patients with more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline, was tabulated. Results: Nineteen patients were studied. Seven patients (36.84%) reached the responder rate. Three patients (50%) in group B were among the responders; two of these patients achieved seizure freedom. Four patients (30.7%) in group A responded favorably to verapamil. Conclusion: Developing new means of improving the effectiveness of existing antiepileptic drugs is a desirable way of tackling the dilemma of medically refractory epilepsy. Hypothetically, P-gp inhibitors (e.g., verapamil) might be used to counteract the removal of AEDs from the epileptogenic tissue. Such a strategy was adopted in this non-placebo-controlled, open-label, pilot study. We observed a significant achievement in seizure control associated with adjunctive use of verapamil in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available