4.5 Article

Magnetic solid-phase extraction of brominated flame retardants from environmental waters with graphene-doped Fe3O4 nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 1969-1976

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201500167

Keywords

Brominated flame retardants; Graphene; Hydrophobic interactions; Magnetic nanocomposites; Solid-phase extraction

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2009CB421601, 2011CB911003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21275069, 21177061, 90913012]
  3. National Science Funds for Creative Research Groups [21121091]
  4. Analysis & Test Fund of Nanjing University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene-doped Fe3O4 nanocomposites were prepared by a solvothermal reaction of an iron source with graphene. The nanocomposites were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, superconducting quantum interference, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This nanomaterial has been used as a magnetic solid-phase extraction sorbent to extract trace brominated flame retardants from environmental waters. Various extraction parameters were optimized including dosage and reusability of the nanocomposites, and pH of sample matrix. The reliability of the magnetic solid-phase extraction protocol based on graphene-doped Fe3O4 nanocomposites was evaluated by investigating the recoveries of 2,4,6-tribromophenol, tetrabromobisphenol A, 4-bromodiphenyl ether, and 4,4'-dibromodiphenyl ether in water samples. Good recoveries (85.0-105.0%) were achieved with the relative standard deviation ranging from 1.1-7.1%. Moreover, it is speculated from characterization and magnetic solid-phase extraction experiment that there is not only pi-pi stacking but also possible hydrophobic interaction between the graphene-doped Fe3O4 nanocomposites and analytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available