4.5 Article

Yield of epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormalities in incident unprovoked seizures: A population-based study

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 1389-1398

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.12720

Keywords

Population-based; Epidemiology; Epileptiform abnormality; Epilepsy; Electroencephalography

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) from NINDS [R01 NS043472]
  2. National Institute of Aging of the NIH [R01 AG034676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe yield of epileptiform abnormalities in serial electroencephalography (EEG) studies has not been addressed in a population-based setting for subjects with incident epilepsy or a single unprovoked seizure, raising the possibility of methodologic limitations such as selection bias. Our aim was to address these limitations by assessing the yield and predictors of epileptiform abnormalities for the first and subsequent EEG recording in a study of incident epilepsy or single unprovoked seizure in Rochester, Minnesota. MethodsWe used the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify all 619 residents of Rochester, Minnesota, born in 1920 or later with a diagnosis of incident epilepsy (n=478) or single unprovoked seizure (n=141) between 1960 and 1994, who had at least one EEG study. Information on all EEG studies and their results was obtained by comprehensive review of medical records. ResultsAmong subjects with epilepsy, the cumulative yield of epileptiform abnormalities was 53% after the first EEG study and 72% after the third. Among subjects with a single unprovoked seizure, the cumulative yield was 39% after the first EEG study and 68% after the third. Young age at diagnosis and idiopathic etiology were risk factors for finding epileptiform abnormalities across all EEG recordings. SignificanceAlthough the cumulative yield of epileptiform abnormalities increases over successive EEG recordings, there is a decrease in the increment for each additional EEG study after the first EEG study. This is most evident in incident epilepsy and in younger subjects. Clinically it may be worthwhile to consider that the probability of finding an epileptiform abnormality after the third nonepileptiform EEG recording is low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available