4.5 Article

Brain development in children with new onset epilepsy: A prospective controlled cohort investigation

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 51, Issue 10, Pages 2038-2046

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02563.x

Keywords

MRI; Epilepsy; Longitudinal

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 44351]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Purpose: To characterize prospective neurodevelopmental changes in brain structure in children with new and recent-onset epilepsy compared to healthy controls. Methods: Thirty-four healthy controls (mean age 12.9 years) and 38 children with new/recent-onset idiopathic epilepsy (mean age 12.9 years) underwent 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 2 years later. Prospective changes in total cerebral and lobar gray and white matter volumes were compared within and between groups. Results: Prospective changes in gray matter volume were comparable for the epilepsy and control groups, with significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in total cerebral gray matter, due primarily to significant (p < 0.001) reductions in frontal and parietal gray matter. Prospective white matter volume changes differed between groups. Controls exhibited a significant (p = 0.0012) increase in total cerebral white matter volume due to significant (p < 0.001) volume increases in the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. In contrast, the epilepsy group exhibited nonsignificant white matter volume change in the total cerebrum (p = 0.51) as well as across all lobes (all p's > 0.06). The group by white matter volume change interactions were significant for total cerebrum (p = 0.04) and frontal lobe (p = 0.04). Discussion: Children with new and recent-onset epilepsy exhibit an altered pattern of brain development characterized by delayed age-appropriate increase in white matter volume. These findings may affect cognitive development through reduced brain connectivity and may also be related to the impairments in executive function commonly reported in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available