4.5 Article

Key tumor suppressor genes inactivated by greater promoter methylation and somatic mutations in head and neck cancer

Journal

EPIGENETICS
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 1031-1046

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/epi.29025

Keywords

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Tumor Suppressor Genes; DNA methylation; somatic mutations; integration analysis

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [U01CA84986, K01CA164092, CA121113]
  2. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [P50DE019032]
  3. Commonwealth Fund
  4. [RC2 DE20957]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) are commonly inactivated by somatic mutation and/or promoter methylation; yet, recent high-throughput genomic studies have not identified key TSGs inactivated by both mechanisms. We pursued an integrated molecular analysis based on methylation binding domain sequencing (MBD-seq), 450K Methylation arrays, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome gene expression arrays in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors and matched uvulopalatopharyngoplasty tissue samples (UPPPs). We uncovered 186 down-regulated genes harboring cancer specific promoter methylation including PAX1 and PAX5 and we identified 10 key tumor suppressor genes (GABRB3, HOXC12, PARP15, SLCO4C1, CDKN2A, PAX1, PIK3AP1, HOXC6, PLCB1, and ZIC4) inactivated by both promoter methylation and/or somatic mutation. Among the novel tumor suppressor genes discovered with dual mechanisms of inactivation, we found a high frequency of genomic and epigenomic alterations in the PAX gene family of transcription factors, which selectively impact canonical NOTCH and TP53 pathways to determine cell fate, cell survival, and genome maintenance. Our results highlight the importance of assessing TSGs at the genomic and epigenomic level to identify key pathways in HNSCC, deregulated by simultaneous promoter methylation and somatic mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available