4.5 Article

Assessment of methylation level prediction accuracy in methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation and sodium bisulfite based microarray platforms

Journal

EPIGENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 410-416

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.4.14763

Keywords

DNA methylation; CpG island; pyrosequencing; MeDIP; batman algorithm

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP86758]
  2. POPH (Operational Program for Human Potential) [SFRH/BD/28642/2006]
  3. MCTES (Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education)
  4. McGill University, Montreal
  5. Agilent Technologies
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/28642/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we verified the accuracy of two array methods-methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled with CpG island microarrays (MeDIP-CGI-arrays) and sodium bisulfite conversion based microarrays (BC-arrays)-in predicting regional methylation levels as measured by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA (BC-pyrosequencing). To test the accuracy of these methods we used the Agilent Human CpG island and the Illumina Human Methylation27 microarrays respectively, and compared microarray outputs to the data from targeted BC-pyrosequencing assays from several genomic regions of corresponding samples. We observed relatively high correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data for both array platforms, R = 0.87 for BC-Array and R = 0.79 for MeDIP-CGI array. However, MeDIP-CGI array were less reliable in predicting intermediate levels of DNA methylation. Several bioinformatics strategies, to ameliorate the performance of the MeDIP-CGI-Arrays did not improve the correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data. The high scalability, low cost and simpler analysis of BC-arrays, together with the recent extended coverage may make them a more versatile methylation analysis tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available