4.5 Article

Vitamin D status and incidence of tuberculosis infection conversion in contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a prospective cohort study

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 143, Issue 8, Pages 1731-1741

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268814002386

Keywords

Interferon-gamma release assay; latent tuberculosis infection; prospective cohort study; tuberculin skin test; tuberculosis; vitamin D

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to estimate the relationship between serum vitamin D (VitD) status and tuberculosis (TB) infection conversion (TBIC), measured by the tuberculin skin test (TST) and an interferon-gamma release assay, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test, in the contacts of pulmonary TB patients in Castellon (Spain) in a prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2012. Initially, the participants were negative to latent TB infection after a screening that included TST and QFT-GIT tests, and other examinations. A baseline determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was obtained by chemiluminescence immunoassay. After 8-10 weeks, participants were screened for a second time to determine TB infection conversion (TBIC). Poisson regression models were used in the statistical analysis. Of the 247 participants in the cohort, 198 (802%) were screened twice and 18 (91%) were TBIC cases. The means of VitD concentration in the TBIC cases and the non-cases were 207 +/- 119 and 272 +/- 114 ng/ml (P = 0028), respectively. Adjusted for high exposure and TB sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-positive index case, higher serum VitD concentration was associated with low incidence of TBIC (P-trend = 0005), and an increase of 1 ng/ml VitD concentration decreased the incidence of TBIC by 6% (relative risk 094, 95% confidence interval 090-099, P = 0015). The results suggest that sufficient VitD level could be a protective factor of TBIC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available