4.5 Article

Identification of Helicobacter pylori infection in symptomatic patients in Surabaya, Indonesia, using five diagnostic tests

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages 986-996

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S095026881400154X

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; Indonesia; virulence factors

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK62813]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [22390085, 22659087, 24406015, 24659200, 23790798]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Institutional Program for Young Researcher Overseas Visits
  4. Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25860544, 25293104, 23790798, 15H02657, 25860545, 26640114, 24406015] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Indonesia is controversial. We examined the H. pylori infection rate in 78 patients in a hospital in Surabaya using five different tests, including culture, histology, immunohistochemistry, rapid urease test, and urine antibody test. Furthermore, we analysed virulence factors in H. pylori strains from Indonesia. The H. pylori infection rate was only 11.5% in all patients studied, and 2.3% of Javanese patients and 18.0% of Chinese patients were infected (P=0.01). Although severe gastritis was not observed, activity and inflammation were significantly higher in patients positive for H. pylori than in patients negative for H. pylori. Among genotypes identified from five isolated strains, cagA was found in four; two were vacA s1m1. All cagA-positive strains were oipA 'on' and iceA1 positive. We confirmed both a low H. pylori infection rate and a low prevalence of precancerous lesions in dyspeptic patients in a Surabaya hospital, which may contribute to the low incidence of gastric cancer in Indonesia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available