4.5 Article

The association of weather and bathing water quality on the incidence of gastrointestinal illness in the west of Scotland

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 142, Issue 6, Pages 1289-1299

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268813002148

Keywords

gastrointestinal infection; Faecal indicators; pathogens; humidity; temperature

Funding

  1. NERC [GE/9001170/1]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1107046] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. NERC [NE/G001170/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G001170/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The associations with weather and bathing water quality on infectious intestinal disease (IID) were investigated using data from two Scottish NHS Board areas. Monthly counts of viral and non-viral gastrointestinal infections were modelled as a smooth function of temperature, relative humidity and average monthly counts of faecal indicator organisms, respectively, adjusting for season and long-term trend effects. Strong seasonal patterns were observed for each group of pathogens. Peak viral gastrointestinal infection was in May while that of non-viral gastrointestinal infections was in July. A statistically significant negative association existed between weather (temperature and humidity) and viral infection. Average levels of non-viral gastrointestinal infections increased as temperature and relative humidity increased. Increasing levels of faecal indicator organisms in bathing waters were also associated with an increase in the average number of viral and non-viral gastrointestinal infections at the ecological level. Future climate change and prolonged precipitation events may result in increasing levels of faecal indicator organisms in bathing waters leading to likely increases in IIDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available