4.6 Article

Wheeze and asthma in children - Associations with body mass index, sports, television viewing, and diet

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 747-755

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181776213

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Obesity, physical activity, and dietary habits are distinct but strongly interrelated lifestyle factors that may be relevant to the prevalence of wheeze and asthma ill Children. Our goal was to analyze the relationship of body mass index (BMI), regular sports participation, TV viewing, and diet with current wheezing and asthma. Methods: We investigated 20,016 children, aged 6-7 years, who were enrolled in a population-based study. Parents completed standardized questionnaires. Logistic regression Was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls), while adjusting for several confounders and simultaneously considering BMI, I-CgUlar Sports activity TV viewing and selected dietary items. Results: A total of 1575 children (7.9%)) reported current wheezing and 1343 (6.7%) reported current asthina. In a multivariate model in elevated BM I was associated with wheeze and Current asthma: I la children front the highest quintile (compared with the lowest quintile) had an increased risk of wheeze (OR 1 47; C1 = 1.20-1,82) or current asthina (1.61 ; 1.28-2.011. Wheeze or asthma was not associated with regular sports activity. Subjects who spent 5 or more hours per clay watching television were more likely to experience wheeze ( 1.53; 1.08-2.17) Or Current asthma ( 1.51; 1.04-2.2) corn-pared with those who viewed TV less than I hour a clay. Adding salt to food was strongly and incidently associated With Current wheeze (2.58; 1.41-4.71) and current asthma (2.68 1-41-5.09). Conclusions: our data Support the hypothesis that high body weight, spending a lot of time watching television, and a salty diet each independently increase the risk of asthina symptoms ill children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available