4.5 Article

Characterization of the interaction between surfactants and enzymes by fluorescence probe

Journal

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 360-365

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.06.014

Keywords

Rhamnolipid; Tween 80; Cellulase; Xylanase; Fluorescence probe

Funding

  1. Beijing University of Technology [00500054K4006]
  2. Foundation for Doctor Research in Beijing University of Technology [X0005013200901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to investigate the mechanism of the different stimulatory effects of the biosurfactant rhamnolipid and the chemical surfactant Tween 80 on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose, the interaction between surfactants and enzymes was analyzed by the fluorescence probe method using pyrene as probe. Based on the evolution law of pyrene fluorescence spectroscopy in the surfactants-enzymes systems, the interaction relationship between surfactants and enzymes was analyzed and discussed in this paper. The results show that enzyme molecules bind with rhamnolipid molecules, participate in the formation of rhamnolipid micelles, and increase the inner hydrophobic polarity of micelles, but do not change the properties of rhamnolipid micelles above the CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration). Nevertheless. for Tween 80, enzyme molecules also participate in the forming of micelles. however, they exhibit a stronger interaction with enzymes above the CMC. Both rhamnolipid and Tween 80 bind more strongly with xylanase than cellulase. Considering also previous experimental results, it can be concluded that the interaction between surfactants and enzymes improve enzyme stability and activity, and, therefore, the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose is enhanced. The findings further provide theoretical knowledge about the mechanism of the stimulative effects of surfactants on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available