4.6 Article

Vanillic acid: A potential inhibitor of cardiac and aortic wall remodeling in L-NAME induced hypertension through upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 643-652

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.07.011

Keywords

Hypertension; Vanillic acid; L-NAME; Cardiac marker enzymes; eNOS expression; Left ventricular function

Funding

  1. Annamalai University for the financial assistance in the form of University Research Fellowship
  2. Welcome Trust Research Laboratory, Department of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore 632 004, India,

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the present study is to investigate the effects of vanillic acid on blood pressure, cardiac marker enzymes, left ventricular function and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression in N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME) induced hypertension in male albino Wistar rats. In hypertensive rats, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, cardiac marker enzymes and organ weight were increased. Impaired left ventricular function and decreased aortic eNOS expression was also observed in hypertensive rats. Moreover, treatment with vanillic acid exhibited beneficial effect on blood pressure, left ventricular function and cardiac marker enzymes. In addition, treatment with vanillic acid on hypertensive rats had upregulated eNOS expression and showed beneficial effects evidenced by histopathology and ultrastructural observations of aorta. In conclusion, vanillic acid has enough potential to normalize hypertension and left ventricular function in L-NAME induced hypertensive rats. With additional studies, vanillic acid might be used as a functional drug or as an adjuvant in the management of hypertension. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available