4.5 Article

Docking-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) predicts binding affinities to aryl hydrocarbon receptor for polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1453-1458

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2191

Keywords

Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs); Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs); Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; Comparative molecular field analysis

Funding

  1. State Key Program for Basic Research of China [2011CB933404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81273122]
  3. Innovation Project for Graduate Student of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ12_0123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) cause toxic effects after binding to an intracellular cytosolic receptor called the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Thymic atrophy, weight loss, immunotoxicity, acute lethality, and induction of cytochrome P4501A1 have all been correlated with the binding affinity to AhR. To study the key molecular features for determining binding affinity to AhR, a homology model of AhR ligand-binding domains was developed, a molecular docking approach was employed to obtain docking-based conformations of all molecules in the whole set, and 3-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) methodology, namely, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), was applied. A partial least square analysis was performed, and QSAR models were generated for a training set of 59 compounds. The generated QSAR model showed good internal and external statistical reliability, and in a comparison with other reported CoMFA models using different alignment methods, the docking-based CoMFA model showed some advantages. Environ Toxicol Chem 2013;32:1453-1458. (c) 2013 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available