4.5 Review

Questions concerning the potential impact of glyphosate-based herbicides on amphibians

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1688-1700

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2268

Keywords

Amphibian decline; Aminomethylphosphonic acid; Polyethoxylated alkylamine; Roundup; Pesticide

Funding

  1. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt fur Naturschutz), Bonn, Germany
  2. German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
  3. Graduiertenkolleg of Trier University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Use of glyphosate-based herbicides is increasing worldwide. The authors review the available data related to potential impacts of these herbicides on amphibians and conduct a qualitative meta-analysis. Because little is known about environmental concentrations of glyphosate in amphibian habitats and virtually nothing is known about environmental concentrations of the substances added to the herbicide formulations that mainly contribute to adverse effects, glyphosate levels can only be seen as approximations for contamination with glyphosate-based herbicides. The impact on amphibians depends on the herbicide formulation, with different sensitivity of taxa and life stages. Effects on development of larvae apparently are the most sensitive endpoints to study. As with other contaminants, costressors mainly increase adverse effects. If and how glyphosate-based herbicides and other pesticides contribute to amphibian decline is not answerable yet due to missing data on how natural populations are affected. Amphibian risk assessment can only be conducted case-specifically, with consideration of the particular herbicide formulation. The authors recommend better monitoring of both amphibian populations and contamination of habitats with glyphosate-based herbicides, not just glyphosate, and suggest including amphibians in standardized test batteries to study at least dermal administration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2013;32:1688-1700. (c) 2013 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available