4.5 Article

Aiptasia pulchella: a tropical cnidarian representative for laboratory ecotoxicological research

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 2653-2662

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.1993

Keywords

Aiptasia pulchella; Tropical marine ecotoxicology; Copper; Cnidaria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An urgent need exists to identify suitable tropical marine species for use in the development of sensitive and reliable test methods for routine laboratory ecotoxicological testing. Corals are a group of organisms not represented in routine ecotoxicology due to inherent difficulties in laboratory husbandry, and sea anemones from the same phylum (cnidaria) may be useful proxies. Aiptasia pulchella is a tropical symbiotic sea anemone with a wide geographic range. It is well suited to laboratory conditions and has been used extensively in research. However, its suitability as a toxicity test species has not been investigated. Assessment of juvenile recruitment in laboratory and semi-outdoor conditions showed higher production in semi-outdoor conditions; however, laboratory rearing produced enough recruits to run routine toxicity tests. In investigations of the sensitivity of A. pulchella to contaminants, acute tests were conducted on 1- to 2-mm juveniles using copper. Lethal concentration, 50% (LC50) values at 96?h estimated from tests using five and 10 replicates ranged from 30 to 83 and 60 to 90 mu g/L, respectively, and a 28-d LC50 of 26 mu g/L was estimated. During the present study, sublethal endpoints were investigated; chronic assessment of inhibited asexual reproduction looks promising (12-d effective concentration, 50% [EC50] 15 mu g/L) and should be assessed further. Aiptasia pulchella is a species worthy of investigation as a cnidarian representative, and will be an invaluable contribution to tropical marine ecotoxicologists. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012; 31: 26532662. (C) 2012 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available