4.5 Article

THE INFLUENCE OF SEDIMENT PARTICLE SIZE AND ORGANIC CARBON ON TOXICITY OF COPPER TO BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES IN OXIC/SUBOXIC SURFACE SEDIMENTS

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1599-1610

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.531

Keywords

Copper; Bivalves; Organic carbon; Particle size; Sediment properties

Funding

  1. Rio Tinto
  2. BHP Billiton
  3. Xstrata Copper
  4. University of Wollongong
  5. CSIRO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of sediment quality guidelines to predict the toxicity of metals in sediments is limited by an inadequate understanding of exposure pathways and by poor causal links between exposure and effects. For a 10-d exposure to Cu-spiked sediments, toxicity to the amphipod Melita plumulosa was demonstrated to occur through a combination of dissolved and dietary Cu exposure pathways, but for the bivalves Spisula trigonella and Tellina deltoidalis, toxicity occurred primarily by exposure to dissolved Cu. For relatively oxidized sediments that had moderate amounts of organic carbon (2.6-8.3% OC), silt (20-100% <63-mu m particles) but low acid-volatile sulfide (AVS), acute toxicity thresholds for the three species were derived based on the OC-normalized Cu concentration of the less than 63-mu m sediment fraction. For all three species, no effects were observed at concentrations below 10 mu g/L dissolved Cu (in pore water and overlying water) or below 12 mg Cu/g OC (for <63 mu m sediment). For sediments with silt/OC properties of 20/0.5, 50/1, or 70/4%, the particulate Cu-based threshold equated to 60, 120, or 480 mg Cu/kg, respectively. For oxic/suboxic sediments in which AVS is not limiting metal availability, sediment quality guidelines of this form will provide adequate protection against toxicity and improve the prediction of effects for sediments with varying properties. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:1599-1610. (C) 2011 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available