4.5 Article

SEDIMENT TOXICITY AND BIOACCUMULATION OF NANO AND MICRON-SIZED ALUMINUM OXIDE

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 422-429

Publisher

SETAC PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/etc.52

Keywords

Nano; Aluminum oxide; Sediment; Toxicity; Bioaccumulation

Funding

  1. U.S. Army's Environmental Quality Technology Basic Research Program
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [0853950] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nano-aluminum oxide (Al(2)O(3)) is used commercially in coatings and abrasives. Nano-Al(2)O(3) can also be generated through the oxidation of nano-aluminum in military propellants and energetics. The purpose of the present study was to assess toxicity and bioaccumulation of nano-Al(2)O(3) to a variety of sediment organisms (Tubifex tubifex, Hyalella azteca, Lumbriculus variegatus, and Corbicula fluminea). The bioaccumulation and toxicity of nano-Al(2)O(3) was compared with that of micron-sized Al(2)O(3) to investigate potential size-related effects. Results of the present study show species-specific differences in relative bioaccumulation of nano- and micron-sized Al(2)O(3). Significant toxic effects (survival and growth) were observed in H. azteca testing, but only at high concentrations unlikely to be found in the environment. Nano-Al(2)O(3) was found to be more toxic than micron-sized Al(2)O(3) to H. azteca survival in a 14-d study in which organisms were in direct contact with a thin layer of 625 or 2,500 mg of Al(2)O(3) dispersed on the surface of either sediment or sand. A significant growth effect was also observed for nano but not micron-sized Al(2)O(3) at the highest treatment level tested (100 g/kg Al(2)O(3)) in a 10-d H. azteca bioassay in which Al(2)O(3) was homogenized with sediment. However, differences in measured sediment Al concentrations (micron-sized = 55.1 [+/- 0.61 g/kg Al; nano-sized = 66.2 [+/- 0.6] g/kg Al) in the nano and micron-sized Al(2)O(3) preclude direct comparison of the toxicity of these two treatments based on particle size. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010;29:422-429. (C) 2009 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available