4.5 Article

SORPTION OF ESTRONE AND ESTRONE-3-SULFATE FROM CaCl2 SOLUTION AND ARTIFICIAL URINE IN PASTORAL SOILS OF NEW ZEALAND

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 2564-2571

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1897/08-534.1

Keywords

Estrone-3-sulfate; Estrone; Sorption; Artificial urine; Effective distribution coefficient

Funding

  1. Foundation for Research, Science and Technology of New Zealand [C09X0217]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrone (E1) and its sulfate conjugate estrone-3-sulfate (E1-3S) are released to the environment in animal wastes in significant amounts, and direct exposure occurs in grazed pasture systems. Both compounds have been shown to potentially contribute to endocrine disruption in wildlife, and knowledge about the sorption behavior of these compounds is necessary for a sound risk assessment. For labile compounds such as E1 and E1-3S, however, the standard protocols might overestimate sorption by not considering metabolite formation or allowing for equilibration that exceeds the commonly reported half-lives of these compounds. We therefore conducted modified batch sorption experiments with 0.005 M calcium chloride (CaCl2) and artificial urine solution to determine the influence of the mediator solution on the sorption of E1 and E1-3S in three pasture soils from New Zealand. Sorption isotherms of both compounds were nonlinear, and the Freundlich equation was found adequate to describe the isotherms. The sorption potential of E1-3S was about one order of magnitude lower than for the free counterpart, and the K-f values significantly changed between the two mediator solutions. The calculation of concentration-dependent effective distribution coefficients (K-d(eff) revealed that for a range of realistic exposure concentrations in a grazed dairy system, the common approach of using CaCl2 would deliver incorrect inferences for a sound risk assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available