4.7 Article

Toxicity and Enantiospecific Differences of Two β-blockers, Propranolol and Metoprolol, in the Embryos and Larvae of Zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1367-1378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.21867

Keywords

acute toxicity; adrenergic receptor; chiral; embryonic developmental toxicity; gene transcription

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20907044, 20837002]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB126100]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Z5090273]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The risk presented by -blockers on aquatic organisms remains uncertain, particularly given the enantiospecific differences in toxicity of chiral -blockers. In this study, the toxicity of two -blockers, propranolol and metoprolol, was determined. The 96-h LC50 of propranolol in the zebrafish larvae was 2.48 mg/L, whereas 50 mg/L metoprolol did not result in death. Both -blockers decreased the heart rate and hatching rate and increased the mortality of the zebrafish embryos. Among these indicators, the heart rate was the most sensitive. However, the acute larval and embryo toxicity results displayed no enantioselectivity. Additionally, the transcriptional response of the genes encoding the -adrenergic receptors and those involved in other physiological processes, including the antioxidant response, detoxification, and apoptosis, in zebrafish larvae exposed to the -blockers was examined. Although the changes in gene transcription were fairly minor, significant enantioselectivity was observed for -blockers, suggesting that the transcriptional response was more sensitive for the evaluation of enantiospecific toxicity. Based on these results, the pharmaceutical drugs were not expected to pose a risk to fish; however, this conclusion should not be considered final. These results also demonstrated that the enantiospecific toxicity of chiral -blockers should be investigated when performing an ecological risk assessment. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 1367-1378, 2014.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available