4.4 Article

Biosorption of arsenite (As+3) and arsenate (As+5) from aqueous solution by Arthrobacter sp biomass

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 19, Pages 2701-2708

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.786137

Keywords

arsenite; arsenate; biosorption; bioremediation; FT-IR spectroscopy; kinetics

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, New Delhi
  2. University Grant Commission, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study we investigated the role of arsenic-resistant bacteria Arthrobacter sp. biomass for removal of arsenite as well as arsenate from aqueous solution. The biomass sorption characteristics were studied as a function of biomass dose, contact time and pH. Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) models were applied to describe the biosorption isotherm. The Langmuir model fitted the equilibrium data better than the Freundlich isotherm. The biosorption capacity of the biomass for As+3 and As+5 was found to be 74.91mg/g (pH 7.0) and 81.63mg/g (pH 3.0), respectively using 1g/L biomass with a contact time of 30 min at 28 degrees C. The mean sorption energy values calculated from the D-R model indicated that the biosorption of As+3 and As+5 onto Arthrobacter sp. biomass took place by chemical ion-exchange. The thermodynamic parameters showed that the biosorption of As+3 and As+5 ions onto Arthrobacter sp. biomass was feasible, spontaneous and exothermic in nature. Kinetic evaluation of experimental data showed that biosorption of As+3 and As+5 followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis indicated the involvement of possible functional groups (OH, C\dbond O and NH) in the As+3 and As+5 biosorption process. Bacterial cell biomass can be used as a biosorbent for removal of arsenic from arsenic-contaminated water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available