4.4 Article

Experimental study on a room temperature urea-SCR of NO over activated carbon fibre-supported CeO2-CuO

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 591-598

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.707232

Keywords

NO; urea; CeO2-CuO; activated carbon fibre; room temperature

Funding

  1. National Undergraduate Innovating Experiment Project [521611185]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108169, 50908080]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA060803]
  4. Scientific and Technological Major Special Project of Changsha City in China [K0902006-x31]
  5. Scientific and Technological Project of Hunan Province in China [2011SK3219, 20103002]
  6. Major Special Project of Hunan Province in China [2010XK6003]
  7. Hunan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to establish a desirable method for NO reduction, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by urea-CeO2/ACF and urea-CeO2-CuO/ACF was carried out at room temperature. The experimental results showed that 10%urea-9%CeO2/ACF could yield the highest NO conversion of 85% among the series of urea-CeO2/ACF prepared. When urea-CeO2-CuO/ACF was compared with urea-CeO2/ACF, it achieved higher NO conversion to a certain degree with the addition of CuO, which was attributed to the synergistic effect between cerium and copper. The effect of the mass ratio of CeO2 and CuO was also observed. The desirable mass ratio of CeO2 and CuO was 1:1, which yielded about 90% NO conversion when ACF was loaded with 10% urea. Furthermore, the influence of O-2 concentration and NO concentration was also observed. In this study, NO conversion increased with increasing O-2 concentration. In addition, some samples were further characterized by BET, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available